Archive Abstracts - Details |
Back to Abstract Search |
Back to Abstract Summaries |
| Research Methods, Surveillance and Codes, Models |
Top of Page |
| Journal Article |
| Allowing for uncertainty due to missing data in meta-analysis-Part 1: Two-stage methods. |
| White IR, Higgins JP, Wood AM. Stat Med 2007; 27(5): 711-727. |
| Affiliation: MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, U.K. |
| DOI: 10.1002/sim.3008 What is this? |
| PMID: 17703496 |
| (Copyright © 2007, John Wiley and Sons) |
| Analysis of a randomized trial with missing outcome data involves untestable assumptions, such as the missing at random (MAR) assumption. Estimated treatment effects are potentially biased if these assumptions are wrong. We quantify the degree of departure from the MAR assumption by the informative missingness odds ratio (IMOR). We incorporate prior beliefs about the IMOR in a Bayesian pattern-mixture model and derive a point estimate and standard error that take account of the uncertainty about the IMOR. In meta-analysis, this model should be used for four separate sensitivity analyses which explore the impact of IMORs that either agree or contrast across trial arms on pooled results via their effects on point estimates or on standard errors. We also propose a variance inflation factor that can be used to assess the influence of trials with many missing outcomes on the meta-analysis. We illustrate the methods using a meta-analysis on psychiatric interventions in deliberate self-harm.
Language: Eng |
|
|
Back to Abstract Search |
Back to Abstract Summaries |
|
