SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Everett SA, Price JH. J. Adolesc. Health 1995; 17(6): 345-352.

Affiliation

Department of Health Promotion and Human Performance, University of Toledo, OH 43606, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1995, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/1054-139X(94)00185-H

PMID

8924440

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate secondary school students' perceptions of violence in American public schools. METHODS: Subjects included 726 public school students in grades 7 through 12. A two-stage clustered and stratified (by grade level, region, and location) sample design was used to obtain the sample. Each student completed a self-administered survey instrument under the supervision of their teacher. RESULTS: The sample was 54% female and the majority of students were white. One in five students reported living in a neighborhood with a lot or some crime. In the majority of cases, males, students from neighborhoods in which crime was prevalent, and students with low academic achievement were most likely to have committed acts of violence. Almost a third of the boys, 7% of girls, and 40% of those who earned poor grades reported having ever carried a weapon to school. One in ten boys and almost 20% of those who earned poor grades reported threatening a teacher. One in four students reported having ever been a victim of violence at or around school, and 14% were very worried or somewhat worried about being physically attacked or hurt at school. One in four students believed the efforts by their schools to address violence were less than adequate. CONCLUSIONS: Schools cannot ignore the need to create a safe environment by coordinating deterrents to violence through discipline, prevention, and education. Because schools alone cannot eliminate the problem of violence, communities must also be involved by working with the schools to create a safe and nurturing environment which fosters learning.

VioLit summary:

OBJECTIVE:
This article by Everett and Price explored seventh through twelfth grade students' perceptions of violence and weapons in U.S. public schools.

METHODOLOGY:
The authors prepared a quasi-experimental secondary analysis of the data collected by Louis Harris and Associates, Inc. in their investigation, "Violence in America's Schools," a survey for the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. The authors obtained data from this quasi-experimental survey on 726 students in American public secondary schools. Each school's principal was responsible for obtaining parental consent. The survey instrument included 44 items, most of which were closed-ended questions. Sections addressed categories of information in the following order: home life, perceived scope of violence (as either victim, observer or perpetrator), impact of violence, school's strategies to reduce school violence, and demographics. A stratified and two-stage clustered sample design produced the sample. The sampling procedures for selection of respondents began with a sample of representative schools being selected from a list of public schools that included grades 3 through 12. Stratification by location, region and grade level sorted the schools. This survey instrument was completed by each student as a supervising teacher read each question aloud.
The authors were looking for answers to the following general questions: 1) What types of violence are most prevalent in the public schools?; 2) What types of students are committing acts of violence in and around schools?; 3) What do students believe are the motivations for other students' acts of violence?; 4) How many students are victimized?; 5) How does violence impact students?; and 6) What steps have schools taken to address the issue of violence in schools, and have these measures been successful?
Descriptive statistics were utilized to provide an overview of the characteristics of the student sample. The authors used a chi-square analysis the ascertain the significance of difference among respondents.

FINDINGS/DISCUSSION:
The authors found answers to all of the above six questions. In general, 75% of their sample was white, and 54% of their sample was female. They calculated that 20% of the sample lived in a neighborhood with some level of crime. The types of violence that students experienced included reports of weapons having been brought to school: 33% of the boys, 7% of the girls, and 40% of low academic achievers brought weapons to school. The most likely student perpetrators of violence were low academic achievers (those earning poor grades), males, and those from high crime prevalence communities. In addition, the authors found that one-tenth of the boys and 20% of low academic achievers reported having issued a violent threat to a teacher. The authors found that the reasons behind student violence included involvement in gangs, with students in high-crime neighborhoods being significantly more likely to commit violent acts (p<.01). The top four factors that contributed to violence in schools were gang membership, lack of parental supervision, drug and/or alcohol use, and exposure to media violence. Chi-square analyses showed that male students were significantly (p<.01) more prone to believing that violence was motivated by "a desire to impress friends, wanting to hurt someone, wanting another's private things, or to belong to a gang" (p. 348). The authors found that 21% of all students sampled reported being the victim of school violence. They also found that violence impacted students: 19% of the sample were "very worried or somewhat worried about being physically attacked or hurt at school" (p. 345). The most common reactions by schools were disciplinary procedures; 79% of respondents reported that violent students were suspended or expelled. More than a quarter of the sample believed that their school's strategies to address the issue of violence in schools were insufficient.

AUTHORS' RECOMMENDATIONS:
The authors concluded that American public schools need to make the creation and maintenance of a safe school environment a high priority. They presented the three elements of success: education, prevention and discipline. The authors recommended that more schools employ education and prevention strategies over the more commonly used disciplinary techniques. The authors asserted that neighborhoods must work cooperatively with their local schools in order to effectively address the problem of violence in schools.

EVALUATION:
In general, this study supports prior research findings that violence in schools is a primary concern of American students. It should be noted that only 45% of the schools contacted completed surveys. The validity of generalizing these findings to all American public secondary schools should be questioned. There may have been an unaddressed self-selection bias on the part of principals who refused to participate. This sample under-represented students from high crime neighborhoods, non-white students and low academic achievers, a point made by the authors. In conclusion, this study emphasizes key components of the problem of violence in America's public schools, as perceived by the students themselves.

(CSPV Abstract - Copyright © 1992-2007 by the Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, Institute of Behavioral Science, Regents of the University of Colorado)

Senior High School Student
Juvenile Violence
School Violence
Juvenile Perceptions
Student Perceptions
Violence Perceptions
Public School
School Environment
Firearms In School
Weapons In School
Fear of Violence
Fear of Victimization
Community Violence
Violence Effects


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print