Citation

Miller DK, Andresen EM, Malmstrom TK, Miller JP, Wolinsky FD. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2006; 61(1): S52-6.

Affiliation

Indiana University Center for Aging Research, 1050 Wishard Blvd., RG-6, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA. dokmille@iupui.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, Gerontological Society of America, Publisher Oxford University Press)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

16399951

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Subclinical status for functional limitation and disability help explain pathways to difficulties with functional limitation and disability, but data on their measurement stability are minimal. We evaluated the reproducibility of measuring subclinical status in a random subset of 92 community-dwelling St. Louis African Americans aged 49 to 65 years old. METHODS: We examined test-retest reliability of subclinical status using Fried's measurement method of changing either the frequency or method of task performance for five functional limitations, three basic activities of daily living (ADLs), and four instrumental ADLs, as well as summary scales reflecting these three constructs. We also performed sensitivity analyses of test-retest interval and alternative definitional approaches (using only method, only frequency, or both). RESULT: Weighted kappas for individual tasks across three performance levels (high functioning, subclinical status, and task difficulty) indicated moderate agreement for one task and substantial agreement for 11 tasks. Intraclass correlation coefficients for the three scales demonstrated outstanding agreement. The most reproducible definition of subclinical status involved the either/or method. DISCUSSION: Excellent test-retest reproducibility was demonstrated in this population-based sample of late middle-aged African Americans using Fried's method of measuring subclinical status.

Language: en