SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

McLean J. Road Transp. Res. 2002; 11(2): 29-42.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2002, Australian Road Research Board)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

A review of the development of US roadside design standards was undertaken in the context of understanding the marked differences between North American and European roadside design practices. The US standards are controlled by a policy of providing a 9 m clear zone on relatively flat roadsides, or equivalent, within which errant vehicles can recover. The policy arose from roadside safety problems on early sections of the Interstate system identified by a Congressional Subcommittee inquiry, and is derived from an industrial safety study at the Ford proving ground. Research into the effectiveness of the clear zone policy found definite safety benefits. However, the roadside hazard model, which was developed to guide the implementation and retrofitting of the policy, was found to greatly overestimate the magnitude of these benefits. It is shown that there were deficiencies in the data set used to derive the model, which would have contributed to this discrepancy. The original roadside hazard model predicted limited safety benefit for clear zone widths less than about 8 m. More recent research has shown a diminishing return between safety benefits and increasing clear zone width, with more than 85% of benefits from a 9 m clear zone being captured in the first 6 m. This implies potential for reasonable safety-cost tradeoffs where it is difficult to provide full 9 m clear zones.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print