Citation

Potdevin F, Gillet C, Barbier F, Coello Y, Moretto P. Percept. Mot. Skills 2008; 107(3): 849-861.

Affiliation

LEMH, Faculte des Sciences du Sport Unwersite de Lille 2, URECA, Universite Charles de Gaulle, Universite de Lille 3. francois.potdevin@univ-lille2.fr

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

19235414

Abstract

The present study was designed to test functional differences between both lower limbs in able-bodied gait according to fore-aft force impulse analyses and to assess the existence of a preferential lower limb for forward propulsion and braking. The leg that did more of the braking (Most Braking Limb) and the leg that did more of the propulsion (Most Propulsive Limb) were defined by the higher negative and positive impulses calculated from the anterior-posterior component of the ground reaction force. 24 adult men free of pain and injury to their lower extremities (M age =25.9 yr., SD=4.5) performed 10 walking trials on a 10-m walkway with two force plates flush mounted in the middle. The anterior-posterior component of the velocity of the center of mass (V(AP)) was calculated with the VICON system. Results highlighted two forms of asymmetry behaviour: although significant bilateral differences between the legs concerning the propulsive and braking impulses were found in all participants, 70.8% of the participants displayed a different Most Braking Limb than Most Propulsive Limb, whereas 25% used the same leg to produce both more propulsion and braking. High consistency was found in the behavioural strategy. Bilateral differences in V(AP) according to the gait cycle (Most Propulsive Limb vs Most Braking Limb) suggested a functional division of tasks between the two lower limbs for 70.8% of the participants. The study provides support for the relevancy of a functional categorization to highlight different asymmetry strategies in able-bodied gait.

Language: en