Citation

Vassar M, Hale W. J. Interpers. Violence 2009; 24(1): 20-37.

Affiliation

College of Osteopathic Medicine, Center for Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, 1111 W. 17th St., Tulsa, OK 74107, USA. matt.vassar@okstate.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2009, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0886260508314931

PMID

18378813

Abstract

Empirical research on anger and hostility has pervaded the academic literature for more than 50 years. Accurate measurement of anger/hostility and subsequent interpretation of results requires that the instruments yield strong psychometric properties. For consistent measurement, reliability estimates must be calculated with each administration, because changes in sample characteristics may alter the scale's ability to generate reliable scores. Therefore, the present study was designed to address reliability reporting practices for a widely used anger assessment, the Buss Durkee Hostility Inventory (BDHI). Of the 250 published articles reviewed, 11.2% calculated and presented reliability estimates for the data at hand, 6.8% cited estimates from a previous study, and 77.1% made no mention of score reliability. Mean alpha estimates of scores for BDHI subscales generally fell below acceptable standards. Additionally, no detectable pattern was found between reporting practices and publication year or journal prestige. Areas for future research are also discussed.

Language: en