Citation

Bensimon M. J. Interpers. Violence 2015; 30(8): 1403-1416.

Affiliation

Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel bensimm@biu.ac.il.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0886260514540331

PMID

24997099

Abstract

The present study enriches our knowledge on the relationship between security personnel and situational cues that may provoke aggression, such as arms and uniforms. The study examined 259 security personnel who completed an aggression questionnaire (AGQ). The study aimed (a) to compare the tendency toward aggression of security personnel who carry or do not carry arms and/or wear a uniform and (b) to compare the tendency toward aggression of men and women security personnel who carry or do not carry arms and/or wear a uniform. The findings indicated no main effect for aggression cueing classification. However, uniformed men had higher scores of physical aggression than women, and women scored significantly higher on anger than men when not carrying any aggressive cues. The findings also revealed that in general, men security personnel reported much higher physical aggression than women, while women showed slightly higher means of verbal aggression than men. The findings are discussed in light of the gender theory and research.

Language: en