SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
Email Signup | RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Hibbin RA, Samuel G, Derrick GE. J. Empir. Res. Hum. Res. Ethics 2018; 13(2): 149-159.

Affiliation

Lancaster University, Lancashire, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, University of California Press)

DOI

10.1177/1556264617751510

PMID

29350083

Abstract

Social media (SM) research presents new challenges for research ethics committees (RECs) who must balance familiar ethical principles with new notions of public availability. This article qualitatively examines how U.K. REC members view this balance in terms of risk and consent. While it found significant variance overall, there were discernible experience-based trends. REC members with less experience of reviewing SM held inflexible notions of consent and risk that could be categorized as either relying on traditional notions of requiring direct consent, or viewing publicly available data as "fair game." More experienced REC members took a more nuanced approach to data use and consent. We conclude that the more nuanced approach should be best practice during ethical review of SM research.


Language: en

Keywords

consent; ethics; privacy; research ethics committee; social media

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print