SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
Email Signup | RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Lee-Koo K. Glob. Responsib. Protect 2018; 10(1-2): 57-74.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Brill Academic Publishers)

DOI

10.1163/1875984X-01001004

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The United Nations Security Council's Children and Armed Conflict agenda is animated by a protection ethic. While the protection of children from violence in armed conflict is entirely appropriate, this article demonstrates that the Council's singular focus upon protection goes beyond merely appropriate, and borders upon overbearing. The article traces the ways that dominant conceptualisations of children as 'innocent victims' has animated an agenda that focuses primarily upon their victimisation that, in turn, reinforces the legitimacy of the protection ethic. It argues that this excludes a nuanced understanding of the lived experiences of children in conflict. In this sense, the agenda is closed to exploring the ways in which children resist, adapt, shape, and survive conflict in ways that position them as agents of their own protection and - in some circumstances - agents of community resilience amidst conflict. Ultimately, this article argues that re-visioning children's relationship to armed conflict provides a strategy to better ensure children's rights and reflects their relationship to peace.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print