Citation

Glenshaw MT, Vernick JS, Frattaroli S, Brown S, Mallonee S. Prehosp. Disaster Med. 2008; 23(6): 500-506.

Affiliation

Center for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. mglenshaw@cdc.gov

Comment In:

Prehosp Disaster Med 2008;23(6):507-9

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, Cambridge University Press)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

19557964

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Bombings, including the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, remain an important public health threat. However, there has been little investigation into the impressions of injury risk or protective factors of bombing survivors. OBJECTIVE: This study analyzes Oklahoma City bombing survivors' impressions of factors that influenced their risk of injury, and validates a hazard timeline outlining phases of injury risk in a building bombing. METHODS: In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted within a sample of Oklahoma City bombing survivors. Participants included 15 injured and uninjured survivors, who were located in three buildings surrounding the detonation site during the attack. RESULTS: Risk factor themes included environmental glass, debris, and entrapment. Protective factors included knowledge of egress routes, shielding behaviors to deflect debris, and survival training. Building design and health status were reported as risk and protective factors. The hazard timeline was a useful tool, but should be modified to include a lay rescue phase. The combination of a narrative approach and direct questioning is an effective method of gathering the perceptions of survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Investigating survivors' impressions of building bombing hazards is critical to capture injury exposures, behavior patterns, and decision-making processes during actual events, and to identify interventions that will be supported by survivors.

Language: en