Citation

Kulick D, Rosenberg H. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2000; 32(1): 85-94.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, OH 43403-0228, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2000, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

10576679

Abstract

A total of 116 students (87 women; 29 men) enrolled at a large, public Midwestern university in the United States were recruited to complete a set of demographic questionnaires and drinking-driving episode surveys. The latter surveys assessed participants' reported motivations for driving or not driving during four recent drinking episodes. Content analyses were used to develop lists of commonly reported reasons for not driving (e.g. found alternate transportation), reasons for driving after drinking (e.g. perceived need to go to destination), potential alternatives to driving after drinking (e.g. walking to destination), and strategies used to avoid detection or arrest by police (e.g. driving more slowly, using back roads or side streets). Participants made both situational and self-coping attributions to explain why they did not, on occasion, drive after drinking. These results may be used as a foundation for prevention and education programs that are designed to: (a) encourage use of coping strategies and alternatives to driving while disputing peer-generated justifications for driving after drinking, and (b) challenge the value of potentially unsafe strategies for avoiding detection and arrest when driving under the influence.