Citation

Panno A, Lauriola M, Figner B. Cogn. Emot. 2013; 27(2): 326-334.

Affiliation

a Department of Social & Developmental Psychology , University of Rome, "Sapienza" , Rome , Italy.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/02699931.2012.707642

PMID

22816531

Abstract

Only very recently has research demonstrated that experimentally induced emotion regulation strategies (cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression) affect risky choice (e.g., Heilman et al., 2010). However, it is unknown whether this effect also operates via habitual use of emotion regulation strategies in risky choice involving deliberative decision making. We investigated the role of habitual use of emotion regulation strategies in risky choice using the "cold" deliberative version of the Columbia Card Task (CCT; Figner et al., 2009). Fifty-three participants completed the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ; Gross & John, 2003) and-one month later-the CCT and the PANAS. Greater habitual cognitive reappraisal use was related to increased risk taking, accompanied by decreased sensitivity to changes in probability and loss amount. Greater habitual expressive suppression use was related to decreased risk taking. The results show that habitual use of reappraisal and suppression strategies predict risk taking when decisions involve predominantly cognitive-deliberative processes.

Language: en