SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Van Acker R, De Bourdeaudhuij I, De Martelaer K, Seghers J, De Cocker K, Cardon G. J. Sch. Health 2012; 82(9): 395-403.

Affiliation

Graduate Research Assistant, (ragnar.vanacker@ugent.be), Ghent University, Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Watersportlaan 2, 9000 Gent, Belgium. Professor, (ilse.debourdeaudhuij@ugent.be), Ghent University, Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Watersportlaan 2, 9000 Gent, Belgium. Associate Professor, (kdmartel@vub.ac.be), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Movement and Sports Training, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussel, Belgium. Assistant Professor, (jan.seghers@faber.kuleuven.be), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Human Kinesiology, Tervuursevest 101 - bus 1500, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium. Graduate Research Assistant, (katrien.decocker@ugent.be), Ghent University, Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Watersportlaan 2, 9000 Gent, Belgium. Associate Professor, (greet.cardon@ugent.be), Ghent University, Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Watersportlaan 2, 9000 Gent, Belgium.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, American School Health Association, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1746-1561.2012.00711.x

PMID

22882102

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After-school physical activity (PA) programs promote PA among youth. Few studies have used socio-ecological health models to identify barriers and facilitators of after-school PA programs. This study examined which socio-ecological factors are associated with having an after-school PA program. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to key representatives of 114 elementary and 129 secondary schools. The association between socio-ecological factors and having an after-school PA program was analyzed at school level. RESULTS: In both types of schools more knowledge about community schools was positively associated with having an after-school PA program (odds ratio [OR] = 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18-3.27; OR = 1.88; 95% CI = 1.27-2.80, respectively). In elementary schools, environmental factors associated with having an after-school PA program included PA facilities (OR = 4.98; 95% CI = 1.08-23.05), a PA working group (OR = 3.37; 95% CI = 1.02-11.10), agreements with the community (OR = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.05-2.43), shortage of human resources (OR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.37-0.89) and lack of support from teachers (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.33-0.80). In secondary schools, environmental factors included the presence of a remunerated coordinator (OR = 5.12; 95% CI = 1.38-19.10) and partnerships with "sport and PA leaders" (OR = 3.54; 95% CI = 1.01-12.41). CONCLUSION: Having an after-school PA program was associated with personal and environmental factors, which supports the use of socio-ecological frameworks for explorative and intervention studies aiming to increase after-school PA programs.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print