Citation

Grove JR, Main LC, Partridge K, Bishop DJ, Russell S, Shepherdson A, Ferguson L. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2014; 24(6): e483-490.

Affiliation

School of Sport Science, Exercise & Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/sms.12214

PMID

24646366

Abstract

Three studies were conducted to validate the Training Distress Scale (TDS), a 19-item measure of training-related distress and performance readiness. Study 1 was a randomized, controlled laboratory experiment in which a treatment group undertook daily interval training until a 25% decrement occurred in time-to-fatigue performance. Comparisons with a control group showed that TDS scores increased over time within the treatment group but not in the control group. Study 2 was a randomized, controlled field investigation in which performance capabilities and TDS responses were compared across a high-intensity interval training group and a control group that continued normal training. Running performance decreased significantly in the training group but not in the control group, and scores on the TDS mirrored those changes in performance capabilities. Study 3 examined the relationship between TDS scores obtained over a 2-week period before major swimming competitions and subsequent performance in those competitions. Significantly, better performance was observed for swimmers with low TDS scores compared with those with moderate or high TDS scores. These findings provide both laboratory and field evidence for the validity of the TDS as a measure of short-term training distress and performance readiness.

Language: en