SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Wolff P. Cognition 2003; 88(1): 1-48.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, 202 Psychology Building, Memphis, TN 38152, USA. pwolff@memphis.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2003, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

12711152

Abstract

This research proposes a new theory of direct causation and examines how this concept plays a key role in the linguistic coding and individuation of causal events. According to the no-intervening-cause hypothesis, a causal chain can be described by a single-clause sentence and construed as a single event if there are no intervening causers between the initial causer and the final causee. Consistent with this hypothesis, participants used single-clause sentences (lexical causatives) more often than two-clause sentences (e.g. periphrastic causatives) for causal chains in which (1) the causer and causee touched (Experiments 1 and 2), and (2) an intervening entity could be construed as an enabling condition rather than another cause (Experiments 2-4). In addition, event judgments paralleled linguistic descriptions: chains that could be described with single-clause expressions were more often construed as single events than chains that could not (Experiments 1-3). Implications for languages other than English, for the linguistic coding of accidental outcomes and for the relationship between cognition and language in general are discussed.

(term-accident-vs-injury)


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print