Citation

Wonderlich SA, Joiner TE, Keel PK, Williamson DA, Crosby RD. Am. Psychol. 2007; 62(3): 167-180.

Affiliation

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of North Dakota School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Fargo, ND 58107-1415, USA. stephenw@medicine.nodak.edu

Comment In:

Am Psychol 2008;63(3):199-200.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1037/0003-066X.62.3.167

PMID

17469896

Abstract

Decisions about the classification of eating disorders have significant scientific and clinical implications. The eating disorder diagnoses in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) reflect the collective wisdom of experts in the field but are frequently not supported in empirical studies and do not capture the disorders of eating experienced by most people with an eating disorder. Statistical approaches to classification such as latent class analysis and taxometrics can help to create a classification system with greater scientific validity and clinical utility. The field would benefit from direct empirical comparisons of different classification schemes with various clinical and scientific validators. Such studies would enable the creators of the next DSM eating disorder classification to increase understanding of the advantages and disadvantages associated with choosing various diagnostic criteria sets for the eating disorders.

Language: en