Citation

Taylor TG, Masserang KM, Pradhan AK, Divekar G, Samuel S, Muttart JW, Pollatsek A, Fisher DL. Proc. Int. Driv. Symp. Hum. Factors Driv. Assess. Train. Veh. Des. 2011; 2011: 187-194.

Affiliation

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, University of Iowa Public Policy Center)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

25285323

Abstract

(a) The purpose of this study was to determine whether novice drivers that were trained to anticipate hazards did so better than novice drivers who were not so trained immediately after training and up to one year after training occurred. (b) Novice drivers who had held their restricted license for about one month were randomly assigned to a PC-based hazard anticipation training program (RAPT) or a placebo (control) training program. The programs took about one hour to complete. The effects of training were assessed in a field drive by using patterns of eye movements to assess whether drivers anticipated a potential unseen hazard. (c) The effects of training persisted over time. In the field test immediately after training, the RAPT group anticipated the hazards 65.8% of the time whereas; the control group anticipated them only 47.3% of the time. Six or more months later, the groups were brought back for a second field test and the effects of training did not diminish; the RAPT group anticipated the hazards 61.9% of the time compared to 37.7% for the control group.

Language: en