Citation

Kubany ES, Richard DC, Bauer GB, Muraoka MY. Aggressive Behav. 1992; 18(5): 337-347.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1992, International Society for Research on Aggression, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Forty undergraduate women were asked to imagine discussing an important problem in their relationship with a personally close partner and to rate likely emotional and behavioral reactions to four kinds of statements: 1) assertive communication of distress, 2) assertive communication of anger, 3) accusatory communication of distress, and 4) accusatory communication of anger. Accusatory "you" statements were rated as more aversive and evoked more negative emotional and behavioral response inclinations than did assertive "I" messages. Statements including "anger" words evoked more negative emotional and behavioral response inclinations than statements including "distress" words. Findings were related to research on cue-controlled aggression and the work of Staats, which predicts ways that verbal labels (language) exert control over emotions and behavior.