SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Mezey G, Durkin C, Dodge L, White S. Crim. Behav. Ment. Health 2015; 25(5): 440-450.

Affiliation

Population Health Research Institute, St Georges University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, United Kingdom.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/cbm.1982

PMID

26464338

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Absconds and escapes by psychiatric patients from secure forensic psychiatric settings create public anxiety and are poorly understood. AIMS: To describe secure hospital patients who escape from within the secure perimeter or abscond, and test for differences between these groups.

METHOD: Escapes and absconds between 2008 and 2012 from the medium and low secure forensic psychiatric inpatient units of two London National Health Service Trusts were identified through the Trusts' databases. Demographic, offending, mental health and incident data were extracted from records for each.

RESULTS: Seventy-seven incidents, involving 54 patients, were identified over the five years. These were 13 escapes involving 12 patients, representing a rate of 0.04 per 1000 bed days, and 64 absconds involving 42 patients, a rate of 0.26 per 1000 bed days; 15 (28%) patients were absent without leave more than once. Over half of the patients came back voluntarily within 24 hours of leaving. Over 50% of them had drunk alcohol or taken drugs while away from the unit. Escapees were more likely to be transferred prisoners and to have planned their escape, less likely to return to the unit voluntarily and away longer than patients who absconded. Offending was rare during unauthorised leave-just three offences among the 77 incidents; self-harm was more likely. Motives for absconding included: wanting freedom or drink or drugs, family worries and/or dissatisfaction with aspects of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS: Escapes or absconding from secure healthcare units have different characteristics, but may best be prevented by convergent strategies. Relational security is likely to be as important for foiling plans for the former as it is for reducing boredom, building strong family support and managing substance misuse in the latter. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print