Citation

Boasso AM, Steenkamp MM, Fox AB, Nash WP, Larson JL, Litz BT. Psychol. Trauma 2016; 8(2): 127-134.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1037/tra0000109

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There has been significant debate about the optimal factor structure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In military and veteran samples, most available studies have employed self-report measures, assessed PTSD cross-sectionally, used treatment-seeking samples, and assessed symptoms years after deployment. We extend previous studies by comparing the factor structure of clinician-assessed and self-report Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) PTSD in a nontreatment seeking sample at 4 time points spanning the deployment cycle.

METHOD: The data source for this study was the Marine Resiliency Study (MRS), a longitudinal study of 4 battalion cohorts of active-duty male Marines deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan between 2008 and 2012. We examined the fourth cohort (N = 892), which was evaluated 1 month predeployment, and 1, 5, and 8 months postdeployment.

RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) revealed that the 5-factor solution best fit the data across all time points, and across both interview and self-report assessments.

CONCLUSION: The temporal consistency and convergence demonstrated by our analyses underscores the validity of the 5-factor model among service members exposed to warzone stressors. In particular, the findings suggest that diagnostic criteria for PTSD may benefit from disaggregating hyperarousal symptoms in military samples.

(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Language: en