SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Beaulne-Séguin Z, Nantel J. Gait Posture 2016; 49: 443-447.

Affiliation

School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ottawa University, Canada. Electronic address: jnantel@uottawa.ca.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.08.002

PMID

27525821

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We asked whether conflicting visual cues influences gait initiation, gait inhibition and postural control in Parkinson's disease (PD) between freezers, non-freezers and healthy older adults.

METHODS: Twenty-five PD participants on dopaminergic medication and 17 healthy older adults were asked to initiate or refrain gait depending on visual cues: green GO (GG), green STOP (GS), red GO (RG), red STOP (RS). Center of pressure (CoP) displacement, variability and mean velocity (VCoP) in the anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) directions and movement time (MT) were measured.

RESULTS: Gait initiation: Both freezers and non-freezers were different from controls in GG and GS. In GS, freezers had smaller CoP displacement and velocity in both directions (p<0.01), while non-freezers had smaller VCoP in AP and ML (p<0.01). AP CoP displacement in GS was smaller in freezers compared to non-freezers (p<0.05). Freezers had longer MT compared to controls in GG and compared to both groups in GS (p<0.01). Gait inhibition: Controls and freezers had larger CoP displacement variability (p<0.05) and velocity (p<0.01) in both directions in RG compared to RS. No differences were seen in non-freezers. Three freezers initiated walking during the RG or RS conditions.

CONCLUSION: Freezers were in general slower at initiating gait, displayed a more restrictive postural strategy and were more affected by the conflicting conditions compared to both controls and non-freezers. In freezers, the conflicting visual cues may have increased the cognitive load enough to provoke delays in processing the visual information and implementing the appropriate motor program.

Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print