SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Gross BW, Edavettal MM, Cook AD, Rinehart CD, Lynch CA, Bradburn EH, Wu D. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016; 82(2): 368-373.

Affiliation

Trauma Services, Penn Medicine Lancaster General Health, Lancaster, PA, USA 2Trauma Research Program, Chandler Regional Medical Center, Chandler, AZ, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/TA.0000000000001291

PMID

27805998

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The appropriate managing center for adolescent trauma patients is debated. We sought to determine whether outcome differences existed for adolescent severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) patients treated at pediatric versus adult trauma centers. We hypothesized that no difference in mortality, functional status at discharge (FSD) or overall complication rate would be observed between center types.

METHODS: All adolescent trauma patients (aged 15-17 years) presenting with isolated sTBI (head Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score ≥3; all other AIS body region scores ≤2) to accredited level I-II trauma centers in Pennsylvania from 2003-2015 were extracted from the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study database. Dead on arrival, transfer, and penetrating trauma patients were excluded from analysis. Adult trauma centers were defined as non-PED (n=24), while standalone pediatric hospitals and adult centers with pediatric affiliation were considered PED (n=9). Multilevel mixed effects logistic regression models and a generalized linear mixed models assessed the adjusted impact of center type on mortality, overall complications, and FSD. Significance was defined as p<0.05.

RESULTS: A total of 1,109 isolated sTBI patients aged 15-17 presented over the 13-year study period (non-PED: 685; PED: 424). In adjusted analysis controlling for age, shock index, head AIS, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) motor, trauma center level of managing facility, case volume of managing facility, and injury year, no significant difference in mortality (AOR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.23-2.86; p=0.754), FSD (Coeff.: -0.85, 95% CI -2.03 to 0.28 p=0.136), or total complication rate (AOR: 1.21, 95% CI 0.43-3.39; p=0.714) was observed between center types.

CONCLUSION: Although the optimal treatment facility for adolescent patients is frequently debated, patients aged 15-17 presenting with isolated sTBI may experience similar outcomes when managed at pediatric and adult trauma centers. KEY WORDS: Adolescent; traumatic brain injury; mortality; pediatric trauma center; adult trauma center LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Epidemiologic study.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print