SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Link D, Lang S, Seidenschwarz P. PLoS One 2016; 11(12): e0168768.

Affiliation

Department of Exercise Science and Sport Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich. Germany.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Public Library of Science)

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0168768

PMID

28036407

Abstract

This study describes an approach to quantification of attacking performance in football (soccer). Our procedure determines a quantitative representation of the probability of a goal being scored for every point in time at which a player is in possession of the ball-we refer to this as dangerousity. The calculation is based on the spatial constellation of the player and the ball, and comprises four components: (1) Zone describes the danger of a goal being scored from the position of the player on the ball, (2) Control stands for the extent to which the player can implement his tactical intention on the basis of the ball dynamics, (3) Pressure represents the possibility that the defending team prevent the player from completing an action with the ball and (4) Density is the chance of being able to defend the ball after the action. Other metrics can be derived from dangerousity by means of which questions relating to analysis of the play can be answered. Action Value represents the extent to which the player can make a situation more dangerous through his possession of the ball. Performance quantifies the number and quality of the attacks by a team over a period of time, while Dominance describes the difference in performance between teams. The evaluation uses the correlation between probability of winning the match (derived from betting odds) and performance indicators, and indicates that among Goal difference (r =.55), difference in Shots on Goal (r =.58), difference in Passing Accuracy (r =.56), Tackling Rate (r =.24) Ball Possession (r =.71) and Dominance (r =.82), the latter makes the largest contribution to explaining the skill of teams. We use these metrics to analyse individual actions in a match, to describe passages of play, and to characterise the performance and efficiency of teams over the season. For future studies, they provide a criterion that does not depend on chance or results to investigate the influence of central events in a match, various playing systems or tactical group concepts on success.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print