SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Jepsen SD, Mann D. Inj. Prev. 2016; 22(Suppl 2): A317-A318.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, BMJ Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042156.891

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Background The horse is the main mode of transportation for Anabaptist populations and as a result, horse-drawn vehicles are involved in a high percentage of injury crashes with the motoring public. Members of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers established an Engineering Practice for animal-drawn buggies and wagons, and recently updated this Practice to include low-profile pony carts in 2014. The recommended practice was created as a consensus document to establish a unique and consistent identification system for animal-drawn vehicles on public roads. Many outreach efforts engage the Anabaptist communities to adopt these national practices with varying degrees of compliance depending upon the geographic region and local culture.

Methods The process relied on a social marketing framework. Social marketing techniques are used to influence a target audience to voluntarily accept, reject or modify a behaviour for the benefit of individuals, groups, or society as a whole. The study was directed by safety staff at The Ohio State University and utilised a five-step approach including: a needs assessment, identification of potential lighting and marking schemes, consensus among the various stakeholders, revision of an existing engineering practice, and dissemination of the standard to encourage adoption of a uniform lighting and marking pattern.

Results Nearly two years was needed to develop consensus among Anabaptist stakeholders and members of the professional engineering society. The lighting scheme incorporated elements from each group, and was evaluated for its practical application, affordability, and visibilty.

Conclusions The revised Engineering Practice enhanced the previous national standard for animal-drawn vehicles and created a consistent lighting and marking pattern. Building consensus between the two groups proved to be a challenging task, yet their collective efforts identified plausible solutions for a roadway safety issue.

Abstract from Safety 2016 World Conference, 18-21 September 2016; Tampere, Finland. Copyright © 2016 The author(s), Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print