SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Karttunen JP, Rautiainen RH. Inj. Prev. 2016; 22(Suppl 2): A132-A133.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, BMJ Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042156.362

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

BACKGROUND Research indicates that farmers in general and livestock farmers in particular have an elevated risk of work-related adverse health outcomes. We investigated gender differences in work tasks and occupational injuries in the Finnish farming population covered by the mandatory workers' compensation insurance.


METHODS Insurance claims data were augmented with data from a postal survey containing questions about the relative division of farm work between male and female farmers.


RESULTS Over the 5-year study period (2009-2013), the average number of farmers was 73,870 (males 67% and females 33%) with a total of 23,004 compensated occupational injuries (males 75% and females 25%). Claims most frequently involved work tasks related to animal husbandry. Altogether 319 usable responses were received to the postal survey (12.9% response rate). Farm work time and occupational injuries differed by gender. In general, crop production, construction work, forestry work, and few other farm work tasks including repair and maintenance of machines, and farmstead and road maintenance were male-dominated, whereas females took the main responsibility for domestic work and caretaking work. Animal husbandry was divided more evenly between males and females with their relative work contributions of 56% and 44%, respectively. Animal husbandry-related injuries were divided correspondingly between the genders (males 57% and females 43%) but all other types of injuries occurred mostly to males.


CONCLUSIONS While many studies have shown that male farmers have a much greater risk of injury than females, our study shows that given equal work time, the risk of injury was also equal. Therefore, rather than a risk factor, gender is an indicator of different work exposures in farming. This finding suggests that targeting interventions to males is still appropriate, but it is more important to target the underlying hazardous work tasks and exposures as they increase the injury risk of both males and females.

Abstract from Safety 2016 World Conference, 18-21 September 2016; Tampere, Finland.

Copyright © 2016 The author(s), Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print