Citation

Geller ES, Casali JG, Johnson RP. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 1980; 13(4): 669-675.

Affiliation

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1980, Wiley-Blackwell)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

16795638

PMCID

PMC1308172

Abstract

Results of 1,579 observations of cars entering or exiting campus parking lots showed direct relationships between seat belt wearing and the intrusiveness of the engineering device designed to induce belt usage, and between device intrusiveness and system defeat. For example, all drivers with working interlocks or unlimited buzzer reminders were wearing a seat belt; but 62% of the systems with interlocks or unlimited buzzers had been defeated, and only 15.9% of the drivers in these cars were wearing a seat belt. The normative data indicated marked ineffectiveness of the negative reinforcement contingencies implied by current seat belt inducement systems; but suggested that unlimited buzzer systems would be the optimal system currently available if contingencies were developed to discourage the disconnection and circumvention of such systems. Positive reinforcement strategies are discussed that would be quite feasible for large-scale promotion of seat belt usage.

Language: en