Citation

Johnson JL, Hobbs SD, Chae Y, Goodman GS, Shestowsky D, Block SD. J. Interpers. Violence 2017; ePub(ePub): 886260517736276.

Affiliation

University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0886260517736276

PMID

29294958

Abstract

Justice can hinge on adults' abilities to distinguish accurate from inaccurate child testimony. Yet relatively little is known about factors that affect adults' abilities to determine the accuracy of children's eyewitness reports. In this study, adults ( N = 108) viewed videoclips of 3- and 5-year-olds answering open-ended and leading questions about positive and negative actually experienced ("true") events or never experienced ("false") events that the children either affirmed or denied. Analyses revealed that adults were more accurate at determining the veracity of negative compared with positive incidents, particularly when children said that they had experienced the event. Moreover, adults' accuracy was at chance for older children's false denials. Psycholegal implications are discussed.

Language: en

Keywords

accuracy; adults; children; discernment; false memory; true memory; valence