Citation

Okorie N. Dev. World Bioeth. 2019; 19(2): 76-85.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/dewb.12201

PMID

29933511

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss the question of partiality and impartiality in the application of triage. Triage is a process in medical research which recommends that patients should be sorted for treatment according to the degree or severity of their injury. In employing the triage protocol, however, the question of partiality arises because socially vulnerable groups will be neglected since there is the likelihood that the social determinants of a patient's health may diminish her chance of survival. As a process that is based on the severity of a patient's injury, triage will be unfair, and hence negatively partial, to socially vulnerable people. Thus, I aim in this paper to show that the triage protocol fails as an impartial evaluative process because its only aim is to maximize survivability. I contend that: (i) triage would lead to the neglect of the social condition of patients or victims, and (ii) it will only serve the utilitarian purpose of maximization of outcomes which may not be justified in some cases.

© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Language: en

Keywords

ethics of triage; impartiality; partiality; patient; social conditions; survivability