SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Beidler E, Bretzin AC, Hanock C, Covassin T. J. Athl. Train. 2018; 53(9): 866-872.

Affiliation

Michigan State University, East Lansing.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, National Athletic Trainers' Association (USA))

DOI

10.4085/1062-6050-266-17

PMID

30273011

Abstract

CONTEXT: : Previous literature on sport-related concussion (SRC) knowledge and reporting behaviors has been limited to high school and National Collegiate Athletic Association collegiate athletes; however, knowledge regarding collegiate club-sport athletes is limited.

OBJECTIVE: : To determine the level of SRC knowledge and reporting behaviors among collegiate club sport athletes and to investigate differences between athletes in traditional and nontraditional sports.

DESIGN: : Cross-sectional study. SETTING: : Survey. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: : A total of 410 athletes (247 males, 163 females) involved in traditional (n = 244) or nontraditional (n = 165) collegiate club sports. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: : The survey consisted of demographics, recognition of SRC signs and symptoms, general SRC knowledge, and reasons why athletes would not report SRCs. The independent variable was sport type. Sport-related concussion signs and symptoms and general knowledge were assessed by the frequency of correct answers to SRC signs and symptoms and general knowledge questions. Sport-related concussion-reporting behavior frequencies were evaluated by asking participants to indicate reasons why they did not or would not report an SRC.

RESULTS: : The SRC signs and symptoms knowledge score was 23.01 ± 3.19 and general SRC knowledge score was 36.49 ± 4.16. No differences were present for SRC sign and symptom knowledge ( F1,408 = 1.99, P =.16) or total SRC knowledge ( F1,408 = 3.28, P =.07) between athletes in traditional and nontraditional collegiate club sports. The most common reason for not reporting an SRC was not recognizing it as a serious injury (n = 165, 40.3%). Chi-square tests demonstrated significant relationships between sport type and 5 reasons for not reporting an SRC.

CONCLUSIONS: : The participants demonstrated moderate to high knowledge of SRCs but indicated they had failed to or would fail to report SRCs for a variety of reasons. The lack of sports medicine coverage and disconnect between knowledge and injury recognition may make collegiate club-sport athletes more likely to participate while concussed.


Language: en

Keywords

injury nondisclosure; physical activity; traumatic brain injuries; university

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print