SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Chiles BD, Nerheim MH, Brave MA, Panescu D, Kroll MW. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2018; 2018: 2234-2239.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers))

DOI

10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512753

PMID

30440850

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Human electronic control with the Conducted Electrical Weapon (CEW) has gained widespread acceptance as the preferred law enforcement force option technology due to its dramatic injury and fatal shooting reduction. However, with bulky or baggy clothing, a CEW probe may fail to make direct skin contact and thus arcing is critical to complete the circuit. The goal of the study was to evaluate the ability of modern CEWs to deliver their pulse charges across typical required arcing distances.

METHODS: Popular TASER® CEW models X26E (openloop output), and the X2 and X26P (with closed-loop outputs) were activated using a cartridge connected to a custom polymer air-gap fixture. For each model 5 units were tested. The raw and normalized charge delivery were evaluated according to ANSI-CPLSO-17.

RESULTS: All 5 units of each model satisfied ANSICPLSO-17 even at maximum arcing length. The X26P CEW had the greatest arcing gap capability.

CONCLUSIONS: The stabilized closed-loop charge output feedback of modern electrical weapons (X2 and X26P CEWs) provides a significantly improved output consistency under arcing conditions. With arc lengths of 10-20 mm per probe, the X2 CEW normalized output charge exceeds that of some units of the older higher output X26E CEW model.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print