Citation

Capellan JA, Johnson J, Porter JR, Martin C. J. Forensic Sci. 2019; 64(3): 814-823.

Affiliation

Law & Justice Studies, Rowan University, 201 Mullica Hill Road, Glassboro, NJ, 08028.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, American Society for Testing and Materials, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/1556-4029.13985

PMID

30562412

Abstract

This study compares the demographic, background, motivation, and pre-event and event-level behaviors across four types of mass public shooters: disgruntled employee, school, ideologically motivated, and rampage offenders. Using a database containing detailed information on 318 mass public shootings that occurred in the United States between 1966 and 2017, we find systematic differences in the characteristics, motivations, target selection, planning, and incident-level behaviors among these offenders. The results show that ideologically motivated shooters to be the most patient, and methodical, and as a result the most lethal. Conversely, disgruntled employees, who are driven by revenge, tend to have little time to plan and consequently are the least lethal shooters. These, among other differences, underscore the need for prevention strategies and policies to be tailored to specific types of offenders. Furthermore, the results also highlight commonalities across offender type, suggesting that the social and psychological pathways to violence are universal across offenders.

© 2018 American Academy of Forensic Sciences.

Language: en

Keywords

forensic science; homicide; ideological extremism; mass murder; mass public shootings; school shootings