SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Rimer JR. Child Abuse Negl. 2019; 90: 160-173.

Affiliation

Oxford University, School of Anthropology & Museum Ethnography, 51/53 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6PE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jonah.rimer@anthro.ox.ac.uk.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.12.008

PMID

30797119

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research about online child sexual exploitation material (CSEM) users focuses on psychological assessments, demographics, motivations, and offending rates. Little is known about their understandings of children in CSEM.

OBJECTIVE: From an anthropological perspective, examine CSEM users' constructions of children and childhood online and offline, and explore how these factor into their crimes. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: CSEM users in UK group programs.

METHODS: In-depth ethnography, including 17 months of participant observation in group programs with 81 CSEM users, 31 semi-structured interviews with group participants, and inductive analysis of themes illuminated by childhood theory from anthropology.

RESULTS: When referring to children offline, many participants claimed to align with Euro-American norms and constructions surrounding children's learning, protection, irrationality, inexperience, asexuality, and innocence. However online, many constructed children differently: as less or not "real," and as sexualized. This rendered children in CSEM fundamentally different, which facilitated offending, assisted in overcoming barriers, and allowed participants to hold conventional beliefs about children and childhood while engaging in incongruent online activity. Vital in this process was Internet use and associated distancing, detachment, anonymity, and cultural othering. The program used victim empathy to restore dominant norms to online children, for which participants invoked feelings, recognized their role in abuse, extrapolated consequences for victims, and reinforced norms.

CONCLUSIONS: Constructions of children and childhood were central in offending. The complexities of negotiating "real" versus "not real" in both offending and victim empathy are discussed, as are conceptual distinctions between "constructions" and "cognitive distortions," and implications for treatment and prevention.

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Anthropology; Childhood; Children; Internet sexual offending; Online child sexual exploitation material; Social construction

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print