SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Trangenstein PJ, Curriero FC, Jennings JM, Webster D, Latkin C, Eck RH, Jernigan DH. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2019; 43(8): 1714-1726.

Affiliation

Boston University School of Public Health, Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/acer.14119

PMID

31157919

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this analysis is to compare measurement methods - counts, proximity, mean distance, and spatial access - of calculating alcohol outlet density and violent crime using data from Baltimore, Maryland.

METHODS: Violent crime data (n=11,815) were obtained from the Baltimore City Police Department and included homicides, aggravated assaults, rapes, and robberies in 2016. We calculated alcohol outlet density and violent crime at the census block (CB) level (n=13,016). We then weighted these CB-level measures to the census tract level (n=197) and conducted a series of regressions. Negative binomial regression was used for count outcomes and linear regression for proximity and spatial access outcomes. Choropleth maps, partial R2 , Akaike's Information Criterion, and root mean squared error guided determination of which models yielded lower error and better fit.

RESULTS: The inference depended on the measurement methods used. Eight models that used a count of alcohol outlets and/or violent crimes failed to detect an association between outlets and crime, and three other count-based models detected an association in the opposite direction. Proximity, mean distance, and spatial access methods consistently detected an association between outlets and crime and produced comparable model fits.

CONCLUSION: Proximity, mean distance, and spatial access methods yielded the best model fits and had the lowest levels of error in this urban setting. Spatial access methods may offer conceptual strengths over proximity and mean distance. Conflicting findings in the field may be in part due to error in the way that researchers measure alcohol outlet density. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Alcohol; alcohol outlet density; spatial access measures; violent crime

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print