SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Bruder C, Hasse C. Appl. Ergon. 2019; 82: e102967.

Affiliation

German Aerospace Center (DLR) Aviation and Space Psychology, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: catrin.hasse@dlr.de.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102967

PMID

31586821

Abstract

In order to detect automation failures in a timely manner, operators are required to monitor automated systems efficiently. The present study analysed eye movements to predict whether or not participants could detect an automation failure. Eye movements were recorded whilst 101 participants were monitoring an automated system where automation failures occurred at irregular intervals. A main result is that about 75.6 per cent of automation failure detections were predicted successfully by the corresponding eye movements. In cases where failures were detected successfully, relevant information is monitored more often and more intensively, in particular shortly before an automation failure happens and while it is happening. The findings are discussed in the context of the personnel selection and training of aviation operatives, as well as incident reporting as used in air traffic control (ATC).

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Automation failures; Eye movements; Eye tracking; Failure detection; Human monitoring; Personnel selection

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print