SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Lempke LB, Johnson RS, Schmidt JD, Lynall RC. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2020; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Affiliation

UGA Biomechanics Laboratory and UGA Concussion Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1249/MSS.0000000000002300

PMID

32053547

Abstract

PURPOSE: Examine the association between clinical and functional reaction time (RT) assessments with and without simultaneous cognitive tasks among healthy individuals.

METHODS: Participants (n=41, 49% female; 22.5±2.1yrs; 172.5±11.9cm; 71.0±13.7kg) completed clinical (drop stick, Stroop) and functional (gait, jump landing, single leg hop, anticipated cut, unanticipated cut) RT assessments in random order. All RT assessments, except Stroop and unanticipated cut, were completed under single (movement only) and dual-task conditions (movement and subtracting by 6's or 7's). Drop stick involved catching a randomly dropped rod embedded in a weighted disk. Stroop assessed RT via computerized neurocognitive testing. An instrumented walkway measured gait RT when center-of-pressure moved after random stimulus. All other functional RT assessments involved participants jumping forward and performing a vertical jump (jump landing), balancing on one leg (single leg hop), or a 45° cut in a known (anticipated cut) or unknown (unanticipated cut) direction. RT was determined when the sacrum moved following random visual stimulus. Pearson correlation coefficients and a 5x2 repeated-measures ANOVA compared RT assessments and cognitive conditions.

RESULTS: Stroop RT outcomes did not significantly correlate with functional RT assessments (r-range=-0.10,0.24). A significant assessment by cognitive task interaction (F4,160=14.01;p<0.001) revealed faster single-task RT among all assessments compared to dual-task (mean differences:-0.11,-0.09s;p<0.001), except drop stick(p=0.195). Single leg hop (0.58±0.11s) was significantly slower compared to jump landing (0.53±0.10s), anticipated cut (0.49±0.09s), gait (0.29±0.07s), and drop stick (0.21±0.03s;p's≤0.001). Dual-task assessments were significantly slower than single-task (mean difference: 0.08s;p<0.001).

CONCLUSION: Clinical and functional RT assessments were not correlated with each other, suggesting sport-like RT is not being assessed post-concussion. Functional and dual-task RT assessments may add clinical value and warrant further exploration post-concussion.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print