SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Rubin GJ, Page L, Morgan O, Pinder RJ, Riley P, Hatch S, Maguire H, Catchpole M, Simpson J, Wessely S. Br. Med. J. BMJ 2007; 335(7630): 1143.

Affiliation

King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychological Medicine, London SE5 9RJ.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, BMJ Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1136/bmj.39367.455243.BE

PMID

17975252

PMCID

PMC2099556

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify public perceptions of the risk to health after the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko with polonium-210 ((210)Po) in London and to assess the impact of public health communications. DESIGN: Cross sectional telephone survey and qualitative interviews. SETTING: London, United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: 1000 people completed the cross sectional survey and 86 potentially exposed people completed the qualitative interviews. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perception of risk to personal health after the (210)Po incident. Qualitative interviews were analysed with an emphasis on information needs. RESULTS: 11.7% of the survey sample (n=117) perceived their health to be at risk. Aside from personal variables the main predictors of perceived risk to health were believing that the incident was related to terrorism (odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 4.6) rather than to espionage, that it was targeted at the wider public rather than one person (5.9, 3.2 to 10.9), and that it could affect people who had not been in the contaminated area (3.2, 2.1 to 5.1). Participants in the qualitative interviews were generally satisfied with the information they had received, although they would have preferred more information about their individual risk of exposure, the results of their urine tests, and the health implications of the incident. CONCLUSIONS: Perceptions of the public that the (210)Po incident in London in 2006 was related to espionage helped to reassure them that the risks to personal health were low. In the event of future incidents it is important to ensure that detailed, comprehensible information about the risks of any exposure is available.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print