SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Schultz CR, Ford HR, Cassidy LD, Shultz BL, Blanc C, King-Schultz LW, Perry HB. J. Trauma 2007; 63(5): 1143-1154.

Affiliation

Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Surgery, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/TA.0b013e31815688e3

PMID

17993964

Abstract

BACKGROUND:: Trauma-related morbidity and mortality are a growing burden in the developing world. However, usable injury data in resource-poor and developing settings is lacking. Trauma registries can improve injury surveillance to enhance trauma care, outcomes, and prevention. This article provides, by example from Haiti, an approach to developing a hospital-based trauma registry in a resource-poor setting. METHODS:: An assessment of trauma documentation was performed retrospectively with subsequent development and pilot testing of two injury surveillance systems. The system most promising for meeting the needs and capabilities of the institution was implemented. RESULTS:: Retrospective medical record review from 1999 (n = 43) and 2002 (n = 43) revealed limitations in available data for trauma surveillance. Specific mechanism of injury was documented in 39.3% and 57.1% of 1999 and 2002 groups, respectively. Injury date and arrival vital signs were infrequently recorded. Two injury surveillance models were designed and pilot tested: provider-based (PTR) (pilot n = 19) and coordinator-based (CTR) (pilot n = 37) trauma registries. Analysis of the pilot testing resulted in revisions to operations and the trauma registry forms. Both registry models showed improved data collection compared with the retrospective study with CTR and PTR documenting specific mechanism of injury in 94.6% and 100% of patients, respectively. The PTR model was chosen for implementation at the hospital. CONCLUSIONS:: Trauma registries in developing settings are plausible tools for injury surveillance. Successful trauma registries will be resource- and setting-specific in design and can potentially be the means by which trauma care and outcomes are improved, prevention programs are developed, and capacity-building goals realized.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print