Citation

Battistella FD, Din AM, Perez L. J. Trauma 1998; 44(4): 618-23; discussion 623.

Affiliation

Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, Health System, Sacramento 95817-2214, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1998, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

9555832

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term survival rate and functional status after trauma for one of the fastest growing segments of the population, patients 75 years and older, is poorly documented. METHODS: Trauma patients 75 years and older who were discharged from our Level I trauma center between June 1988 and July 1992 (n = 279) were contacted by mail or phone. Public death records were used to identify patients who had died. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of poor outcome (death within 6 months). Main outcome measures included mortality and self-assessed functional status. RESULTS: A minimum 4-year follow-up was obtained for 81% of the 279 study patients. The mean follow-up period was 5.4 +/- 1.1 years. Mean age at time of injury was 81 +/- 5 years (range, 75-101 years); mean Injury Severity Score was 9.4 +/- 7.7. At follow-up, 132 patients (47%) had died, 93 patients (33%) were contacted, and 54 patients (19%) could not be located. Twelve percent of patients survived less than 6 months after discharge. Poor survival was predicted by preexisting diseases (dementia, p = 0.001; hypertension, p = 0.02; and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, p = 0.05) and not by age or severity of injury. The mean age of patients still living was 85 +/- 3.9 years (range, 79-99 years), and 77 of 93 patients were living in an independent setting (33 alone, 44 with spouse or family); of these, 57% reported no difficulties in performing 12 of 14 activities of daily living. CONCLUSION: Despite higher than expected mortality after discharge, aggressive management of trauma patients 75 years and older is justified by the favorable long-term outcome.