Citation

Chen H, Liu P, Lu JJ, Behzadi B. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2009; 41(3): 543-551.

Affiliation

Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave. CUT 110, Tampa, FL 33620, United States. hchen@cutr.usf.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2009, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.aap.2009.01.016

PMID

19393805

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impacts of the number and arrangement of lanes on freeway exit ramps on the safety performance of freeway diverge areas. The research team collected crash data at 343 freeway segments in the state of Florida. Four different types of exit ramps were considered in this study. They were defined as type 1, type 2, type 3, and type 4 exit ramps respectively. Cross-sectional comparison was conducted for comparing crash frequency, crash rate and crash severity between different types of freeway exit ramps. Crash prediction models were developed to identify the factors that contribute to the crashes reported at selected freeway segments and to provide quantified information regarding the safety impacts of different freeway exit ramps. It was found that the ramp and freeway AADT, posted speed limit on freeway, deceleration lane length, right shoulder width, and the type of exit ramp significantly affected the safety performance of freeway diverge areas. The study demonstrated the safety benefits of using lane-balanced exit ramps. Based on the crash prediction models, replacing a type 1 exit ramp (lane-balanced) with a type 2 exit ramp (not lane-balanced) will increase crash counts at freeway diverge areas by 68.33%. Replacing a type 3 ramp (lane-balanced) with a type 4 ramp (not lane-balanced) will increase crash counts at freeway diverge areas by 32.20%.

Language: en