@article{ref1,
title="Measure for Mis-measure: A Response to Gartzke and Li",
journal="Journal of peace research",
year="2003",
author="Barbieri, Katherine and Peters, R. A.",
volume="40",
number="6",
pages="713-719",
abstract="Barbieri & Peters (B&P) question Gartzke & Li's (G&L's) conclusion that the contradictory findings between Barbieri andOneal & Russett on the trade-conflict question can be explained by their use of alternative measures. There are problems with G&L's analysis. First, G&L's findings are based on analyses with measures incompatible with Barbieri's. Second, G&L adopt measures that are not truly dyadic. Third, G&L draw erroneous conclusions from their mathematics. B&P explain these problems and present empirical analyses that show that even when controlling for economic openness, as G&L propose, dyadic interdependence is still positively associated with conflict.B&P find support for G&L's conclusion that openness promotes peace.<p />",
language="",
issn="0022-3433",
doi="10.1177/00223433030406006",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00223433030406006"
}