@article{ref1,
title="Evaluating Intangible Outcomes",
journal="American journal of evaluation",
year="2008",
author="Selameab, Tehout and Yeh, Stuart S.",
volume="29",
number="3",
pages="301-316",
abstract="Increasingly, program managers are required to evaluate programs with multiple outcomes against costs. This is difficult when program outcomes are not easily translated into a common metric. This article compares cost benefit analysis with Multiple Attribute Utility Technology and discusses the application of judgment in both analytical techniques. Multiple Attribute Utility Technology is illustrated with a case example to demonstrate how it may be applied to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of programs with multiple intangible outcomes.<p />",
language="",
issn="1098-2140",
doi="10.1177/1098214008319170",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214008319170"
}