@article{ref1,
title="Triage and Injury Severity Scores as predictors of mortality and hospital admission for injuries: A validation study",
journal="Accident analysis and prevention",
year="2010",
author="Camilloni, Laura and Giorgi Rossi, Paolo and Farchi, Sara and Chini, Francesco and Borgia, Piero and Guasticchi, Gabriella",
volume="42",
number="6",
pages="1958-1965",
abstract="BACKGROUND: Many emergency departments use a rating system to establish priority based on urgency: &quot;triage&quot;. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of triage in predicting hospitalization and mortality compared to that of the ICD-9-CM based Injury Severity Score (ISS). METHODS: Sources: The Emergency Information System 2000, the Hospital Information System 2000-2001 and the Mortality Register 2000-2001, of the Lazio Region. Case selection: Emergency department visits for traumas that occurred on the road or at home. Outcomes: Hospitalization and 30-day mortality. For each case, trauma diagnoses from the ICD-9-CM were given a corresponding ISS value. We performed logistic models, including age, sex and, alternatively, triage or ISS. We compared discrimination measures and calibration of the models. RESULTS: Out of 264,709 emergency department visits, 22,249 (8.4%) were followed by a hospitalization and 655 (0.2%) died within 30 days. ISS scores were calculated for 72,179 (27%) cases. Of the most urgent triage (840 patients), 78.3% (658) were hospitalized and 9% (76) died, while among patients with ISS>/=16 value (1276) 36.4% (464) of were hospitalized and 1.8% (23) died. Measures of discrimination and calibration showed similar results. The triage model had a better fitness in predicting hospitalization probability for home accidents (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic: chi(2)(triage)=5.5 vs chi(2)(ISS)=34.3) and had a better performance for road accidents (ROC(triage)=0.71 vs ROC(ISS)=0.66). There were no differences between the models in predicting the probability of death. CONCLUSIONS: The agreement between the two scales confirms the validity of triage as a clinical management tool in the emergency department, and as a proxy of trauma severity.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0001-4575",
doi="10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.019",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.019"
}