@article{ref1,
title=""Wars on Terror" and Vicarious Hegemons: The Uk, International Law, and the Northern Ireland Conflict",
journal="International and comparative law quarterly",
year="2005",
author="Campbell, Cathy",
volume="54",
number="02",
pages="321-356",
abstract="The hegemonic position of the United States, and its implication for international law, are rapidly emerging as sites of intense scholarly interest.1 It is a truism that the fall of the Berlin wall has been followed by a period of unprecedented American predominance in the military, economic, and political spheres. Replacing the bi-polar certainties of the Cold War is a world in flux, dominated, to a significant extent, by one remaining superpower, or, in the words of the former French Foreign Minister, Hubert Vedrine, by a ‘hyperpower’. 2 Some though, have emphasised the continuing importance of other loci of (lesser) power in a ‘uni-multipolar’ world.3 That this domination posed critical questions for international law was obvious well before the 9/11 atrocities, as the debate over NATO's use of force in Kosovo illustrated. Since the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, and with the global ‘war on terror’ reaching into ever-increasing spheres, the debate has intensified significantly.<p />",
language="",
issn="0020-5893",
doi="10.1093/iclq/lei002",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei002"
}