
@article{ref1,
title="Human sex differences in <i>d</i>‐amphetamine self‐administration",
journal="Addiction",
year="2010",
author="Vansickel, Andrea R. and Stoops, William W. and Rush, Craig R.",
volume="105",
number="4",
pages="727-731",
abstract="<p>Women and men may respond differently to the effects of stimulants such as amphetamine and cocaine.</p> <p><b>Aim</b> In order to assess potential sex differences in the reinforcing effects of<i> d</i>‐amphetamine, a retrospective‐analysis was conducted on data collected from three studies that employed similar <i>d</i>‐amphetamine self‐administration procedures and used identical subject‐rated drug‐effect measures.</p> <p><b>Methods</b> Data from 10 women and 15 men were included in the analysis. In all studies, participants sampled placebo, low (8–10 mg) or high (16–20 mg) dose oral <i>d</i>‐amphetamine. Following sampling sessions, participants worked for capsules containing one eighth of the previously sampled dose on a modified progressive‐ratio schedule of reinforcement. We hypothesized that women and men would be differentially sensitive to the reinforcing effects of <i>d</i>‐amphetamine. A two‐way mixed‐model analysis of variance (sex and dose) and planned comparisons were used in the statistical analyses.</p> <p><b>Results</b> The low dose of <i>d</i>‐amphetamine functioned as a reinforcer in women, but not men, whereas the high dose of <i>d</i>‐amphetamine functioned as a reinforcer in men, but not women. Men self‐administered significantly more capsules under the high dose condition than women.</p> <p><b>Conclusion</b> The results of this study suggest that men are more sensitive to the reinforcing effects of a high dose of <i>d</i>‐amphetamine than women. Future research is needed that determines prospectively the reinforcing effects of weight‐adjusted doses of <i>d</i>‐amphetamine in women and men while controlling for menstrual cycle phase.</p><p />",
language="",
issn="0965-2140",
doi="10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02858.x",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02858.x"
}