@article{ref1,
title="The efficacy of the 11 and the 11+ in injury prevention and physical fitness improvement on male collegiate football teams",
journal="British journal of sports medicine",
year="2011",
author="Saho, Y. and Suzuki, T. and Setojima, M. and Ogai, T. and Fukubayashi, T.",
volume="45",
number="4",
pages="313-313",
abstract="Background The 11 and The 11+ are accepted effective injury-prevention training programs for junior football (soccer) players. However, their impact on physical fitness is unclear. Objective To elucidate the effectiveness of The 11 and The 11+A in injury prevention and physical fitness improvement. Design A prospective and pre-post intervention study. Setting The first division of a Japanese collegiate football league. Participants This study included 182 collegiate male football players, who were divided into three groups: The 11 (n=62), The 11+A (n=60) and Control (n=59). 77 players were evaluated for physical fitness. Interventions The 11 program, originally developed by FIFA, and The 11+A, by one of the authors, were conducted once or twice a week for 6 months. The 11+A focuses on plyometric training and differs slightly from The 11+. Main outcome measures Injury incidence rates during football (game and training), game and training were reported as the number of injuries per 1000 player-hours (PH). Using several field tests (sprint, pro-agility, bounding and balance), each subject's physical fitness level was evaluated prior to and 6 months after training. Results The incidence rates during football, game and training were 3.62, 19.18 and 2.58 injuries/PH in the Control group, 2.27, 11.92 and 1.53 injuries/PH in The 11 group and 2.24, 10.75 and 1.75 injuries/PH in The 11+A group, respectively. The injury incidence rate during football was significantly lower in both the training groups than in the Control group (p<0.05). Pro-agility time was significantly decreased in both training groups than in the Control groups (p<0.05). Balance ability improved significantly only in the 11 group (p<0.05). Conclusion The 11 and The 11+A were effective in injury prevention and physical fitness improvement.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0306-3674",
doi="10.1136/bjsm.2011.084038.10",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2011.084038.10"
}