@article{ref1,
title="Pr32p
evaluating anatomical research in surgery: a prospective comparison of cadaveric and living anatomical studies of the abdominal wall",
journal="ANZ journal of surgery",
year="2009",
author="Rozen, W. M. and Chubb, D. and Stella, D. L. and Taylor, G. I. and Ashton, M. W.",
volume="79",
number="",
pages="A60-A61",
abstract="Background:   Cadaveric research has widely influenced our understanding of clinical anatomy. However, while many soft-tissue structures remain quiescent after death, other tissues undergo structural and functional changes that may influence their use in predicting living anatomy. In particular, our understanding of vascular anatomy has been based upon cadaveric studies in which vascular tone and flow do not match the living situation.<p />",
language="",
issn="1445-1433",
doi="10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.04927_32.x",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.04927_32.x"
}