
@article{ref1,
title="THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE VIOLENCE RISK SCALE: A Treatment-Friendly Violence Risk Assessment Tool",
journal="Psychology, public policy, and law",
year="2006",
author="Wong, Stephen C.P. and Gordon, Audrey",
volume="12",
number="3",
pages="279-309",
abstract="<p><br/>The development of risk assessment tools that use dynamic variables to predict recidivism and to inform and facilitate violence reduction interventions is the next major challenge in the field of risk assessment and management. This study is the first in a 2-step process to validate the Violence Risk Scale (VRS), a risk assessment tool that integrates violence assessment, prediction, and treatment. Ratings of the 6 static and 20 dynamic VRS variables assess the client's level of risk. Ratings of the dynamic variables identify treatment targets linked to violence, and ratings of the stages of change of the treatment targets assess the client's treatment readiness and change. The VRS scores of 918 male offenders showed good interrater reliability and internal consistency and could predict violent and nonviolent recidivism over both short- and longer term (4.4-year) follow-up. The probability of violent and nonviolent recidivism varied linearly with VRS scores. Dynamic and static variables performed equally well. The results support the contention that the VRS can be used to assess violent risk and to guide violence reduction treatment.</p><p />",
language="",
issn="1076-8971",
doi="10.1037/1076-8971.12.3.279",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.12.3.279"
}