@article{ref1,
title="The Enforcement of Speeding: Should Fines Be Higher for Repeated Offenses?",
journal="Proceedings of the Road Safety on Four Continents Conference",
year="2005",
author="Delhaye, Eef",
volume="13",
number="",
pages="21p-21p",
abstract="Speed limits are a well-known instrument to improve traffic safety. However, speed limits alone are not enough; there is need for enforcement of these limits. In this paper we analyze the existing Belgian fine structure for speeding offenses. We make two observations. First, the fine increases with the severity of the violation. Secondly, the fine depends on the speeders offense history. That fines increase with the level of violation is a basic result in the literature. However, the literature is mixed with respect to the relationship with the offense history. This paper focuses on this last point. The paper confronts two fine structures, both increasing with speed: a uniform fine and a differentiated fine, which depends on the offense history. Drivers differ in their propensity to have an accident and hence in their expected accident costs. Literature then prescribes that the fine for bad drivers should be higher than for good drivers. However the government does not know the type of the driver. The paper states that the number of previous convictions gives information on the type of the driver. The paper wants to know which structure minimizes the welfare losses. The result depends on the strength of the relationship between the type and having a record. The paper illustrates this by means of a numerical example.<p />",
language="",
issn="",
doi="",
url="http://dx.doi.org/"
}