@article{ref1,
title="HIV prophylaxis is deemed pertinent evidence in rape trial",
journal="Aids policy and law",
year="2000",
author="",
volume="15",
number="1",
pages="10-10",
abstract="A Georgia trial judge acted properly in admitting into evidence the fact that a rape victim took an antiretroviral drug for six months following her attack. The victim, identified as J. A., was raped by an HIV-positive defendant, identified as Parks. Parks was found guilty of battery and aggravated sodomy, and similar charges related to another victim, both of whom he also threatened with a shotgun. The Georgia Court of Appeals held that disclosing J. A.'s prophylactic treatment with AZT demonstrated that she would not have had consensual unprotected sex if she knew Parks was HIV-positive.<p /><p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0887-1493",
doi="",
url="http://dx.doi.org/"
}