@article{ref1,
title="A nonimpact article about nonimpact injury",
journal="Applied neuropsychology",
year="2001",
author="Lang, C. J.",
volume="8",
number="2",
pages="113-116",
abstract="If reports of this caliber are required to insinuate that significant &quot;brain damage&quot; may ensue from rather mild nonimpact injury, there is some a priori reason to believe that this is not the case. The introduction of security belts, head rests, side-impact protection, and air bags has made driving safer; yet, the incidence of &quot;brain injury&quot; is allegedly rising. To definitely settle this issue, we will have to wait for other, preferably prospective, randomized, double-blind studies yielding a higher class of evidence. So, what do we learn from this study? First, in the United States, it is possible to select a sample of litigants that after a car accident or similar injury behaves and complains the way they did, even if there was no proof of morphological brain damage. Second, reports like this headed by a misleading title should better go unpublished until certain minimal standards of scientific scrutiny are met.<p /><p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0908-4282",
doi="10.1207/S15324826AN0802_6",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15324826AN0802_6"
}